Government Regulators are Monopolies

Here is the third article in a series on regulation I have been publishing at FEE: “Government Regulators are Monopolies.” It is part of a project to challenge the validity of government “regulation,” which should more properly be called government “restriction,” as that word describes what government agencies mostly do: they restrict people’s freedom to make voluntary exchanges.

The aim of the project is to reduce government restriction of freedom by showing that there is a better alternative—regulation by market forces.

The first article in the series, “There Is No Such Thing as an Unregulated Market,” shows that government regulation is not the only kind of regulation; free markets are closely regulated by the free choices of market participants. So which kind of regulation works better? The second article, “Government Regulators are Unregulated,” begins to examine that question, showing that because government agencies are accountable upward in the political process to ever more distant and unconcerned elected officials and rationally ignorant voters, they are in practice not accountable at all.

This third piece shows further that

government agencies that regulate … quality and safety … are legal monopolies. Those they regulate are required to abide by the government agencies’ decisions; the regulated enterprises have no freedom to choose different quality-assurance services from some competing entity instead.

In short, government regulatory agencies are themselves unregulated monopolies, unaccountable in any meaningful way to the public they are supposed to serve.

There is a better way. Upcoming articles in the series will show how regulation by market forces works, and why it works better than government “regulation.”

Those who would like to read a more fully fleshed-out presentation of these ideas (academically oriented but I hope still clear and accessible) will find it in my Cato Journal article on which the series is based, “Regulating Regulators: Government vs. Markets.”

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

The Welfare Cliff, a.k.a. the Low-Wage Trap

Pretend you are a poor, single parent of two in Chicago, earning $12 an hour, working full time, and determined to do what is best for your family. And suppose your employer, impressed with your work, offers you training for and promotion to a new job paying $15. Should you take the offer? It soundsContinue Reading

Government Regulators are Themselves Unregulated; That’s a Problem

Here’s a delayed posting of a link to a second article in The Freeman online about regulation. The first, “There Is No Such Thing as an Unregulated Market,” made the point that “If a market is free, it is closely regulated by the free choices of market participants.” This means that “Government regulation is not the only kind ofContinue Reading

Value in a Free Market

Here is a response to a comment posted by TheOneSpam on May 30, 2016, on “What If There Were No Prices?“, a Learn Liberty video by Tomasz Kaye and me: +TheOneSpam I’m one of the authors of this video; I like much of what you say; here are my responses to your comments: “how “value”Continue Reading

More on Campus Free Speech

After the exchange about free speech on campuses that I put into this earlier post, Cliff wrote back at length. With his permission I respond here so that others can look in on the conversation. Here are the substantive portions of Cliff’s message, indented, with my reactions not indented: (1) There are a lot ofContinue Reading

Freedom of Speech on Campus: Even Racial Slurs?

Last week I shared on Facebook this video of J.K. Rowling supporting Donald Trump’s right to travel to Britain and “be offensive and bigoted,” because “his freedom to speak protects my freedom to call him a bigot.” I wrote, “The same goes for offensive and bigoted speech on college campuses.” That comment elicited this responseContinue Reading

Minimum Wage Laws Are Immoral, Part II

Two weeks ago I posted on Learn Liberty’s blog this open letter rejoinder to my friend Adam, who strongly objected to a claim I had made in a Facebook post that minimum wage laws are immoral. Adam responded to that rejoinder, and I replied again in turn with this second open letter. A slice: Adam: I accept the disemployment, suchContinue Reading

Make Parents Responsible for Schools

Here’s a recent letter to the Baltimore Sun: May 11, 2016 Editor, the Baltimore Sun Dear Editor, Kurt Schmoke, Matt Gallagher and Tom Wilcox ask “Who’s responsible for city schools?” (Commentary, May 9, 2016). The broad answer to that question is also the fundamental reason why our city schools stay mediocre to poor, decade afterContinue Reading

Minimum Wage Laws Are Immoral

Here is an open letter to a respected friend with whom I have strong differences about minimum wage laws. It was recently published at the Learn Liberty blog. A slice: Your indignation at allowing companies to pay (and workers to accept) wages below “a living wage” seems based in an assumption that all employers canContinue Reading

Government, Stop Trying To Help Uber

Here is a letter to the editor of the Baltimore Sun, published at FEE’s Anything Peaceful and by the Sun yesterday (the online version somehow dropped the first paragraphs): An open letter to State Senator Bill Ferguson and Delegate Kathy Szeliga: Thank you for your commentary, “Give ridesharing a home in Maryland,” (Baltimore Sun, April 3). While it is gratifyingContinue Reading

Contact Dr. Baetjer

Enter your email address:

Skip to toolbar