Two Minutes, $9.99

Yesterday afternoon I got Facebook notification of a new post by my friend Clark Neily. On clicking “View Post,” I found Clark’s enthusiastic recommendation of The Martian. The embedded link took me to Amazon’s page for the Kindle edition of the book, where I clicked “Buy now with 1-Click.” Immediately I received notification that Amazon was sending The Martian to my Kindle.

I don’t know how much time passed between my first learning that Clark likes that book and my having it in my possession, ready to read, but I doubt it could have been more than two minutes. It might have been as little as twenty-five seconds.

That little experience put me in mind of the widespread claim these days that the American economy is not making average Americans better off anymore. A quick Google search finds me, for example, a report from the Economic Policy Institute entitled “A Decade of Flat Wages, The Key Barrier to Shared Prosperity and a Rising Middle Class.” It states,

The wage and benefit growth of the vast majority, including white-collar and blue-collar workers and those with and without a college degree, has stagnated, as the fruits of overall growth have accrued disproportionately to the richest households. (emphasis added)

Is that italicized passage true? I don’t think so. The focus on money incomes obscures the way our still mostly free economy delivers the goods, in tremendous abundance, to average Americans. Facebook, which makes it easy for me to keep in touch with friends like Clark, was founded in 2004, within the past “decade of flat wages.” And from the average Americans who use it, Facebook requires no expenditure of wages at all. It’s free. Amazon’s Kindle, enjoyed primarily by the non-rich, was launched in 2007, also within the last decade. It’s not free but it’s wonderful, and $9.99 is less than I would have had to spend for a book a decade ago. The Google search, with which I found the EPI’s report explaining how my life has stagnated in recent years, was also free. So is the report.

Such fruits of overall growth are accruing to everyone.

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

Undermining Terrorism With Property Rights

If young men in the Arab world had meaningful prospects of economic advancement, they would not be drawn into jihadi groups. Hence the key to successfully opposing ISIS and other extremist groups is to set up the institutions necessary for free-market capitalism: private ownership and freedom of exchange. So argues the great Peruvian Hernando deContinue Reading

Regulation of Lodging by the Market Process

Does the lodging industry—hotels and such—need government regulation? I don’t think so, and I’m more convinced than before after listening yesterday to a fascinating EconTalk conversation ( between host Russ Roberts and Nathan Blecharczyck, a founder of the lodging service AirBnB. Blecharczyck explains that every AirBnB customer rates every property in which she stays, forContinue Reading

The Need to Regulate Destructive Regulation

Here is a letter to the Wall Street Journal today: To the Editor: The legal hassling you describe of ride-sharing services such as Sidecar, Uber, and Lyft (“Ride-Sharing Services Face Legal Threat From San Francisco, Los Angeles,” Sep. 25, 2014) is farcical. What should be shut down is not the ride services, but the regulations and taxicabContinue Reading

Liquid Assets

The Freeman has published a piece in which I contrast the disorderly allocation of water with the orderly allocation of gasoline. A slice: Now what about water in drought-stricken states? Water prices are set by “authorities” at arbitrary prices that don’t change to reflect water availability. The authorities allocate water to various uses. But howContinue Reading

Unregulated By Government Doesn’t Mean Unregulated

Many people believe that markets must be either regulated by government or unregulated. They believe that if we don’t want markets out of control, lacking in regularity, predictability, and quality control, we have to let governments regulate them. But that’s false, because markets forces regulate markets. The actions of every market participant constrain and influence theContinue Reading

No Public Service Here

Here is a letter to the Baltimore Sun: To the editor: By its decision to regulate Uber as a “common carrier” (“Uber is ‘common carrier,’ commission rules,” Thursday, August 7), the Maryland Public Service Commission (PSC) stands athwart the tide of technology and history. Allowed to stand, the ruling would harm Marylanders. Why restrict Uber’s freedomContinue Reading

How Free Market Forces Would Regulate Banks

One of my numerous smart and interested students at Towson University (yes, I’m fortunate), a non-economics major named Kristin, has sent me the following question in response to my recent post, “One Reason Governments Should Not Regulate Banks“: How would you rely on free market forces to better regulate banks? Here is my reply: Kristin,Continue Reading

One Reason Governments Should Not Regulate Banks

A big reason why governments should not regulate banks is painfully illustrated this week in “Banks Battle Weight Issues” in the Wall Street Journal  (July 22). The article focuses on New York Community Bancorp, which is “projected to reach the $50 billion mark by the end of the year if it continues to expand at its current rate.”Continue Reading

Who Has the Wealth of the Wealthy Rentiers?

Prompted by Thomas Piketty’s book Capital in the Twenty-First Century, I ask the question in this post’s title in a recent Freeman article. A slice: Let’s begin with the source of the income of the idle rich in a free economy. (We need this proviso, “in a free economy,” because in an unfree, crony capitalist economy, the idleContinue Reading

Contact Dr. Baetjer

Enter your email address: