What’s Holding Up Economic Growth

Three articles in last weekend’s Wall Street Journal offer a sampler of the kinds of government intervention that are hampering the world economy, from South Africa to Detroit to France. On page A8 a headline declares, “Blackouts Stall South Africa Economy.” Why doesn’t South Africa have dependable power? Because the country’s power provider is a government-owned monopoly:

Accidents at South Africa’s aging stock of coal-burning power plants and construction delays at a new one have regularly pushed generating capacity of the state-owned power provider, Eskom Holdings Ltd., below daily demand of about 32,000 megawatts. (my emphasis)

Three pages later we read that “The Motor City’s Regulators are Hitting the Brakes on Regrowth.” How? By denying peaceful enterprisers permission to operate:

The Operation Compliance Initiative [aims] to regulate Detroit’s 1,500 illegal unlicensed businesses. Most operate on extremely low profits and … are often run out of homes. Part of a complex underground economy, they are usually in poor areas. They offer everything from auto parts and electrical equipment, to basic retail and in-house dining—but they all have failed to meet the permitting and licensing requirements mandated by the city and the state of Michigan. (my emphasis)

So the government is shutting down these little businesses.

One page after that “Notaries Public to the Barricades” gives the good news that in France, surprisingly, a genuine reformer is trying to roll back government intervention:

The Bill for Growth and Activity … would demolish longstanding barriers to entry for the legal and notary professions, open up domestic rail lines to competition from private bus companies, fast-track the adjudication of some labor disputes, and lower some of the environmental hurdles developers need to jump to gain approval for new projects. The bill also would require the government to dispose of up to €10 billion ($12 billion) in state-owned assets, primarily in airports and utilities.

That article goes on to say, unsurprisingly, that the special interest groups which benefit from the targeted interventions are objecting:

The protests against these common-sense reforms have already started. First up were the attorneys, notaries and bailiffs, who last week flooded Parisian streets, robes and all, to object to [the] plan to make it easier for recently minted lawyers to start their own practices and to reduce the tariffs and legal privileges currently enjoyed by these “protected professions.”

Economic health depends on private ownership and freedom of exchange. The government of South Africa should privatize Eskom Holdings, Ltd. and open up electricity production to competition. Detroit should repeal its business licensing and lay off all city bureaucrats who enforce it. France should pass the Bill for Growth and Activity and plenty more like it. Governments everywhere should get out of the way of human creativity and enterprise.

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

The Coolest Thing About Uber

A letter I wrote the Wall Street Journal recently, criticizing the authoritarian flavor of one of its columns, was picked up by The Freeman. A slice: Here’s what it takes to make Uber a success, apparently: Enter new markets without asking regulators for permission, then build enough of a customer base to make classifying the service asContinue Reading

Uber Against Racial Profiling

In my latest article in The Freeman, I look at another instance of the superiority of regulation by market forces to regulation by government. A slice: Uber is regulated by market forces, and market forces regulate far more effectively than the DC taxi commission does. Uber gets a cut of every fare, so the more fares it arranges, theContinue Reading

How Free-Market Internet Will Protect the Little Guy

An earlier post gave a rights-based reason to oppose “Net Neutrality”: Internet service providers own their fiber optic cables, switches, and so on, the physical infrastructure of the Internet. It’s their property. Their rights to their own should be respected. Not everyone is persuaded by rights-based reasoning. Dan H., for example, discussing the post onContinue Reading

All We Need to Know About “Net Neutrality”

In thinking about the controversy over “net neutrality” that President Obama stirred up on Monday, we should keep in mind that private ownership and freedom of exchange are the foundations of a free society. Internet service providers own their fiber optic cables, switches, and so on, the physical infrastructure of the Internet. It’s their property.Continue Reading

Can the Oil-Export Ban

Here is a letter to The Wall Street Journal: To the editor: Why do we have a taint of Soviet-style central planning in the American oil industry? Americans’ high standard of living, not to mention our status as a free society, results from private ownership rights and freedom of exchange. So why should American oilContinue Reading

Two Minutes, $9.99

Yesterday afternoon I got Facebook notification of a new post by my friend Clark Neily. On clicking “View Post,” I found Clark’s enthusiastic recommendation of The Martian. The embedded link took me to Amazon’s page for the Kindle edition of the book, where I clicked “Buy now with 1-Click.” Immediately I received notification that AmazonContinue Reading

Undermining Terrorism With Property Rights

If young men in the Arab world had meaningful prospects of economic advancement, they would not be drawn into jihadi groups. Hence the key to successfully opposing ISIS and other extremist groups is to set up the institutions necessary for free-market capitalism: private ownership and freedom of exchange. So argues the great Peruvian Hernando deContinue Reading

Regulation of Lodging by the Market Process

Does the lodging industry—hotels and such—need government regulation? I don’t think so, and I’m more convinced than before after listening yesterday to a fascinating EconTalk conversation (http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2014/09/nathan_blecharc.html) between host Russ Roberts and Nathan Blecharczyck, a founder of the lodging service AirBnB. Blecharczyck explains that every AirBnB customer rates every property in which she stays, forContinue Reading

The Need to Regulate Destructive Regulation

Here is a letter to the Wall Street Journal today: To the Editor: The legal hassling you describe of ride-sharing services such as Sidecar, Uber, and Lyft (“Ride-Sharing Services Face Legal Threat From San Francisco, Los Angeles,” Sep. 25, 2014) is farcical. What should be shut down is not the ride services, but the regulations and taxicabContinue Reading

availableonamazon
Contact Dr. Baetjer

Enter your email address: